Please help us improve our site!
Amdt24.1 Overview of Twenty-Fourth Amendment, Abolition of Poll Tax
Ratification of the Twenty-Fourth Amendment in 1964 marked the culmination of an endeavor begun in Congress in 1939 to eliminate the poll tax as a qualification for voting in federal elections. Property qualifications extend back to colonial days, but the poll tax itself as a qualification was instituted in eleven states of the South following the end of Reconstruction, although at the time of the ratification of this Amendment only five states still retained it.1 Footnote
Harman v. Forssenius, 380 U.S. 528, 538–40, 543–44 (1965) ; United States v. Texas , 252 F. Supp. 234, 238–45 (W.D. Tex. 1966) (three-judge court), aff’d on other grounds, 384 U.S. 155 (1966) . Congress viewed the qualification as “an obstacle to the proper exercise of a citizen’s franchise” and expected its removal to “provide a more direct approach to participation by more of the people in their government.” Congress similarly thought that a constitutional amendment was necessary,2 Footnote
H.R. Rep. No. 1821 , 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 3, 5 (1962) . because the qualifications had previously survived constitutional challenges on several grounds.3 Footnote
Breedlove v. Suttles, 302 U.S. 277 (1937) ; Saunders v. Wilkins, 152 F.2d 235 (4th Cir. 1945) , cert. denied, 328 U.S. 870 (1946) ; Butler v. Thompson , 97 F. Supp. 17 (E.D. Va) , aff’d, 341 U.S. 937 (1951) .
Footnotes 1 Harman v. Forssenius, 380 U.S. 528, 538–40, 543–44 (1965) ; United States v. Texas , 252 F. Supp. 234, 238–45 (W.D. Tex. 1966) (three-judge court), aff’d on other grounds, 384 U.S. 155 (1966) . 
2 H.R. Rep. No. 1821 , 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 3, 5 (1962) . 3 Breedlove v. Suttles, 302 U.S. 277 (1937) ; Saunders v. Wilkins, 152 F.2d 235 (4th Cir. 1945) , cert. denied, 328 U.S. 870 (1946) ; Butler v. Thompson , 97 F. Supp. 17 (E.D. Va) , aff’d, 341 U.S. 937 (1951) .
